Ash Reduction Model 2" Diameter Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version
1.4, Tara L. Eberhart, Andrew J. Storer, Linda M. Nagel
|
|
Copyright
Michigan Technological University
|
|
Version 1.4 Input
Requirements
|
|
10/3/2008
|
|
ASH Trees Only
|
|
|
Trees per Acre
|
|
|
Ash Species may be used,
but if not known use Any Ash Species column
|
|
|
Open Grown Trees
|
|
Use Open Grown Model if
most trees are receiving 4 or 5 sides of direct sunlight
|
|
|
2" Size Class
Increments
|
|
Use Forest Model if
working in a forest setting or most trees receiving sunlight on 3 sides or
less
|
|
|
No. Trees Per Acre
|
|
|
|
|
|
DBH Class "
|
Any Ash Species
|
Green Ash and/or White Ash
|
Black Ash
|
% Surface Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retaining Small Trees
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Percentages
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diameter Limit Cut
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Cutting all ash down to this size
limit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retaining Large Trees
|
|
|
|
Target Percentages
|
|
|
|
Diameter Limit Cut
|
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
|
95%
|
|
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Cutting all ash up to
this size limit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
|
|
|
This
version of the model serves to show what diameter limit cut would be needed
in order to reduce the total surface area of ash trees in a stand by a
desired amount.
|
|
The bottom
table of Retaining Large Trees is calculated from the same graph as the top
table, with the percent axis reversed.
|
|
This model
can be used with Fraxinus nigra,
or F. pennsylvanica
and F. americana
combined, or if species is only partially known, or not known at all, any ash
species may be entered.
|
|
Separate
equations are used for individual species but the total ash reduction is
combined for all the ash in the stand.
|
|
Light
Exposure and crown class have been accounted for in this model. The open
grown version is appropriate if the majority of trees in the target area
|
|
are open
grown trees, or are receiving full sunlight on 4 or 5 sides including the top
of the tree.
|
|
The Forest
version of the model is appropriate if the target reduction area is a forest
setting and the majority of trees are receiving sunlight on 3 sides or less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 500
ash trees have had their specific morphology recorded to estimate total
surface area which is a good indicator of total phloem available to emerald
ash borer.
|
|
This model
only works with the ash component of a stand regardless of total stand size,
other tree species presence, or how much ash there is present.
|
|
|
Depending
on management goals, this model can be used to determine a lower diameter
limit cut to retain small trees,
|
|
and an
upper diameter limit cut to retain large trees. Surface area can be used as
an estimate of phloem, a critical resource, available to
|
|
emerald
ash borer in a stand. Use of this model in management decisions will reduce
the ash resource available to emerald ash borer
|
|
by a target
percentage and help maintain ash as a component in our forests and its
genetic diversity
|
|
|
Note:
surface area reduction will reduce the amount of breeding substrate (phloem)
in the stand by a target level,
|
|
thereby
reducing the population potential of eab, not ensuring remaining ash to be
uninfested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|