Ash Reduction Model 1" Diameter Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version
1.0, Tara L.Eberhart, Andrew J. Storer, Linda M. Nagel
|
|
Copyright
Michigan Technological University
|
|
|
5/6/2006
|
|
|
|
|
This
version of the model serves to show what diameter limit cut would be needed
in order to reduce the total surface area of ash trees in a stand by a
desired amount.
|
|
Over 500
ash trees have had their specific morphology recorded to estimate total
surface area which is a good indicator of total phloem available to emerald
ash borer.
|
|
Ash
species, growing conditions, and phloem widths will be incorporated in future
models.
|
|
This model
only works with the ash component of a stand regardless of total stand size,
other tree species presence, or how much ash there is present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version
1.0 Input Requirements
|
|
ASH
Trees Only
|
|
Trees per
Acre
|
|
Retaining Small Trees
|
|
Retaining Large Trees
|
|
|
Target Percentages
|
|
Target Percentages
|
|
This
information should be available from stand and stock tables.
|
Diameter Limit Cut
|
|
Diameter Limit Cut
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
95%
|
|
|
95%
|
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
|
1" Size Class
Increments
|
|
75%
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
DBH Class "
|
No.
Trees/Acre
|
% Surface Area
|
Cumulative
Surface Area Ascending
|
Cumulative Surface Area Decending
|
s
|
x
|
95% calc
|
|
90%calc
|
|
99% calc
|
|
0.75
|
|
50
|
|
25
|
|
DBH Class "
|
No.
Trees/Acre
|
Equation
|
Total Surface Area/ D class
|
% Surface Area
|
Cumulative Surface Area Ascending
|
Cumulative Surface Area Decending
|
s
|
b
|
95% calc
|
|
90%calc
|
|
99% calc
|
|
0.75
|
|
50
|
|
25
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
0.9
|
|
0.99
|
|
0.75
|
|
0.5
|
|
0.25
|
|
0.95
|
|
0.9
|
|
0.99
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
Depending
on management goals, this model can be used to determine a lower diameter
limit cut to retain small trees,
|
|
and an
upper diameter limit cut to retain large trees. Surface area can be used as
an estimate of phloem, a critical resource, available to
|
|
emerald
ash borer in a stand. Use of this model in management decisions will reduce
the ash resource available to emerald ash borer
|
|
by a
target percentage and help maintain ash as a component in our forests and its
genetic diversity
|
|
|
Note:
surface area reduction will reduce the amount of breeding substrate (phloem)
in the stand by a target level,
|
|
thereby
reducing the population potential of eab, not ensuring remaining ash to be
uninfested
|
|