Ash Reduction Model (Metric) 1 cm Diameter
Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version
1.1b, Tara L.Eberhart, Andrew J. Storer, Linda M. Nagel
|
|
Copyright
Michigan Technological University
|
|
Version 1.1b Input
Requirements
|
|
9/25/2006
|
|
|
|
ASH Trees Only
|
|
|
|
Trees per Acre
|
|
|
|
This information should
be available from stand and stock tables.
|
|
|
|
|
Note: this model version
is in METRIC units
|
|
|
1 cm Size Class
Increments
|
|
|
DBH Class cm
|
No.
Trees/Acre
|
% Surface Area
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Retaining Small Trees
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Target Percentages
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
Diameter Limit Cut
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
*Cutting all ash down to this size
limit
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
Retaining Large Trees
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
Target Percentages
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
Diameter Limit Cut
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
* Cutting all ash up to
this size limit
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
This version of the model serves to
show what diameter limit cut would be needed in order to reduce the total
surface area of ash trees in a stand by a desired amount.
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
Over 500 ash tree's have had their
specific morphology recorded to estimate total surface area which is a good
indicator of total phloem available to emerald ash borer.
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
Ash species, growing conditions, and
phloem widths will be incorporated in future models.
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
This model only works with the ash
component of a stand regardless of total stand size, other tree species
presence, or how much ash there is present.
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
Depending on management goals, this
model can be used to determine a lower diameter limit cut to retain small
trees,
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
and an upper diameter limit cut to
retain large trees. Surface area can
be used as an estimate of phloem, a critical resource, available to
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
emerald ash borer in a stand. Use of this model in management decisions
will reduce the ash resource available to emerald ash borer
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
by a target percentage and help
maintain ash as a component in our forests and its genetic diversity
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
Note: surface area reduction will
reduce the amount of breeding substrate (phloem) in the stand by a target
level,
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
thereby reducing the population
potential of eab, not ensuring remaining ash to be uninfested
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|